#76782 - A2hok - Fri Mar 24, 2006 7:52 pm
Hi
I just would like to know who is working on an IM for the DS, and if WEP is supported by these programs.
_________________
White DS --- Supercard SD --- Passcard ---
-------www.ugames.tk--------
[url="http://www.oxado.com/?origin=pub88742"]Webmasters, make money displaying Oxado contextual ads![/url]
#76787 - ?hr - Fri Mar 24, 2006 8:35 pm
http://thoduv.drunkencoders.com/
its worked on. not finished yet.
use dslinux for irc.
#76848 - thoduv - Sat Mar 25, 2006 10:36 am
Don't use DSlinux at all ! :)
Project in progress !
#76851 - ?hr - Sat Mar 25, 2006 11:28 am
but its not working yet :D
which messengers are included in your project?
AIM? Y!M/YIM? IRC? ICQ? MSN? RENDEZVOUS?
#76854 - hmpedersen - Sat Mar 25, 2006 12:02 pm
I'm lookin forward to this :)
If it has MSN and GTalk, then it'll be great :)
#76856 - ?hr - Sat Mar 25, 2006 1:41 pm
yes google talk would be great, but i think normal only text messengers would be ok(for the beginning.
after all if alias zero releases his source of hellods, thoduv could add this in his project too :)
#76858 - hmpedersen - Sat Mar 25, 2006 1:53 pm
Google talk is text..
(the sound part is not as good as skype)
#76859 - kevinc - Sat Mar 25, 2006 2:07 pm
Well, it all depends on when sgstair releases his TCP stack (unless somebody is thinking on implementing *that* themselves).
For the MSN it would be cool if Ink was supported, though it is heavily undocumented.
[EDIT: woot, nevermind, they can also be transmitted as GIFs]
#76864 - tepples - Sat Mar 25, 2006 4:20 pm
| kevinc wrote: |
| For the MSN it would be cool if Ink was supported |
So would it be possible to make a PC side proxy between Ink and Pictochat?
_________________
-- Where is he?
-- Who?
-- You know, the human.
-- I think he moved to Tilwick.
#76871 - ?hr - Sat Mar 25, 2006 5:41 pm
| hmpedersen wrote: |
Google talk is text..
(the sound part is not as good as skype) |
google talk has much better soundquality as skype
#76873 - tepples - Sat Mar 25, 2006 6:01 pm
But can it be compressed and decompressed on a 67 MHz CPU? And is the software available as open source? Google Talk text uses the Jabber protocol for text communication, but only the Google Talk brand client supports voice.
_________________
-- Where is he?
-- Who?
-- You know, the human.
-- I think he moved to Tilwick.
#76880 - ?hr - Sat Mar 25, 2006 7:27 pm
| talk.google.com wrote: |
5. What protocols are used for voice calls?
Google Talk uses extensions to XMPP for voice signaling and peer-to-peer communication. Source code and documentation for these extensions is now available. |
i think 67MHz are enough.
perhaps with a push-to-talk function, so the cpu isnt used all the time 100%.
when alias zero can develope something like this, why not porting gtalk on ds?
#76883 - hmpedersen - Sat Mar 25, 2006 8:17 pm
| ?hr GmbH wrote: |
| hmpedersen wrote: | Google talk is text..
(the sound part is not as good as skype) |
google talk has much better soundquality as skype |
Yeah.. Except for a single detail..
Sound quality in skype is way superior to that of google ;)
#76885 - Nushio - Sat Mar 25, 2006 8:44 pm
| ?hr GmbH wrote: |
| talk.google.com wrote: | 5. What protocols are used for voice calls?
Google Talk uses extensions to XMPP for voice signaling and peer-to-peer communication. Source code and documentation for these extensions is now available. |
i think 67MHz are enough.
perhaps with a push-to-talk function, so the cpu isnt used all the time 100%.
when alias zero can develope something like this, why not porting gtalk on ds? |
Because the way google sends voice is propietary, there are no documents that specify how to interact with the vocie server
#76886 - MaHe - Sat Mar 25, 2006 9:04 pm
| ?hr GmbH wrote: |
| after all if alias zero releases his source of hellods |
There is no HelloDS. It's a scam. Jesus. <_<
#76889 - tssf - Sat Mar 25, 2006 9:45 pm
| Nushio wrote: |
| ?hr GmbH wrote: | | talk.google.com wrote: | 5. What protocols are used for voice calls?
Google Talk uses extensions to XMPP for voice signaling and peer-to-peer communication. Source code and documentation for these extensions is now available. |
i think 67MHz are enough.
perhaps with a push-to-talk function, so the cpu isnt used all the time 100%.
when alias zero can develope something like this, why not porting gtalk on ds? |
Because the way google sends voice is propietary, there are no documents that specify how to interact with the vocie server |
That simply means one needs to reverse engineer the process. :D
| MaHe wrote: |
| There is no HelloDS. It's a scam. Jesus. <_< |
Maybe some people didn't know it, no need to get upset. :)
_________________
Mathew Valente [TSSF]
------
Chrono Resurrection Musician
#76939 - HtheB - Sun Mar 26, 2006 3:16 pm
| MaHe wrote: |
| ?hr GmbH wrote: | | after all if alias zero releases his source of hellods |
There is no HelloDS. It's a scam. Jesus. <_< |
?hr GmbH ---> OWNED!
#76940 - ?hr - Sun Mar 26, 2006 3:18 pm
| HtheB wrote: |
| MaHe wrote: | | ?hr GmbH wrote: | | after all if alias zero releases his source of hellods |
There is no HelloDS. It's a scam. Jesus. <_< |
?hr GmbH ---> OWNED! |
well see...
#76976 - ahat - Mon Mar 27, 2006 2:11 am
| MaHe wrote: |
| ?hr GmbH wrote: | | after all if alias zero releases his source of hellods |
There is no HelloDS. It's a scam. Jesus. <_< |
You still offend me, sir.
#77007 - Darkflame - Mon Mar 27, 2006 12:29 pm
| tssf wrote: |
| Nushio wrote: | | ?hr GmbH wrote: | | talk.google.com wrote: | 5. What protocols are used for voice calls?
Google Talk uses extensions to XMPP for voice signaling and peer-to-peer communication. Source code and documentation for these extensions is now available. |
i think 67MHz are enough.
perhaps with a push-to-talk function, so the cpu isnt used all the time 100%.
when alias zero can develope something like this, why not porting gtalk on ds? |
Because the way google sends voice is propietary, there are no documents that specify how to interact with the vocie server |
That simply means one needs to reverse engineer the process. :D
|
Surely it says in that quote "Source code for these extensions is available" :-/
#77015 - thoduv - Mon Mar 27, 2006 2:45 pm
| ?hr GmbH wrote: |
but its not working yet :D
which messengers are included in your project?
AIM? Y!M/YIM? IRC? ICQ? MSN? RENDEZVOUS? |
I'm first planning on MSN, IRC and Jabber, but plugins can be made for other protocols ! :)
#113689 - msa - Fri Dec 29, 2006 7:40 pm
why isnt there ANY DSicq?!
i thought icq is the most popular IM?! it seems that my thoughts were wrong oO
#113740 - Sektor - Sat Dec 30, 2006 6:14 am
I think ICQ is probably third in the popularity contest but I have no figures to back that up. ICQ is owned by AOL anyway, so it's really just MS vs AOL.
DSAIM is also an ICQ client, you just enter your ICQ number in the username field.
_________________
GTAMP.com/DS
#114075 - Darkflame - Wed Jan 03, 2007 4:48 pm
ICQ is much more used then AIM, even if it is (now) owned by AOL.
Anything is better then MSN anyway.
(which seems last to the "offline messages" party everyone else can do)
_________________
Darkflames Reviews --
Make your own at;
Rateoholic:Reviews for anything, by anyone.
#114093 - user6336 - Wed Jan 03, 2007 11:06 pm
| Darkflame wrote: |
ICQ is much more used then AIM, even if it is (now) owned by AOL.
Anything is better then MSN anyway.
(which seems last to the "offline messages" party everyone else can do) |
From just doing a lot of google searching on the topic, I've found that in the USA AIM has a gigantic marketshare (not including ICQ), and ICQ is very tiny now. I also read that ICQ was the most popular one in foreign countries, but since MSN started supporting those markets better, MSN has taken over ICQ in the other markets, and AIM isn't that high over there.
Pretty much what I'm saying is just write programs for what's popular for the people using it! :)